↓ Skip to main content

The Effectiveness of Anti-leukotriene Agents in Patients with COPD: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Lung, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#40 of 891)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
The Effectiveness of Anti-leukotriene Agents in Patients with COPD: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis
Published in
Lung, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00408-015-9743-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jong Hoo Lee, Hyun Jung Kim, Yee Hyung Kim

Abstract

Anti-leukotriene (anti-LT) agents have been not yet established for effectiveness in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess whether anti-LT agents have the responsiveness for COPD patients. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register, and Korea Med were searched for relevant clinical trials to review. Seven studies involving 342 patients were finally analyzed. Pooled estimation from three randomized controlled studies did not demonstrate that anti-LT agents increased forced expiratory volume in 1 s [overall effect: 0.09 L, 95 % confidence interval (CI) -0.04 to 0.21; P = 0.17; I (2)  = 41.0 %] or forced vital capacity (overall effect: 0.04 L, 95 % CI -0.04 to 0.11; P = 0.64; I (2) = 0.0 %). As for inflammatory markers, anti-LT agents did not affect the level of myeloperoxidase (standardized mean difference, -0.15; 95 % CI -0.65 to 0.36) or LTB4 (standardized mean difference, -0.41; 95 % CI -0.96 to 0.13). They reduced the frequency of dyspnea [relative risk (RR) 0.43; 95 % CI 0.29 to 0.64] and sputum (RR 0.37; 95 % CI 0.22 to 0.63), based on overall estimation from two non-randomized studies. However, our review revealed that there are few well-designed, randomized controlled studies with large sample sizes and long treatment durations. Although symptomatic improvements were demonstrated in some studies, there is a lack of evidence to support the therapeutic efficacy of anti-LT agents in patients with COPD. Further large-scale, long-term studies are needed to identify predictive factors for COPD patients who may benefit from anti-LT agents.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 10 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 38%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,904,047
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Lung
#40
of 891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,991
of 264,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lung
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 891 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,835 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.