You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Oceanobacillus arenosus sp. nov., a moderately halophilic bacterium isolated from marine sand
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1099/ijs.0.000360 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wonyong Kim, Chatuphon Siamphan, Jong-Hwa Kim, Ampaitip Sukhoom |
| Abstract |
A Gram-positive, spore-forming, rod-shaped, motile, strictly aerobic bacterium, designated CAU 1183T, was isolated from a marine sand and its taxonomic position was investigated using a polyphasic approach. The bacterium grew optimally at a temperature of 30C at pH 8.5 in the presence of 2% (w/v) NaCl. Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequences showed that strain CAU 1183T formed a distinct lineage within the genus Oceanobacillus and exhibited the highest similarity to Oceanobacillus chungangensis (97.6%). The strain contained MK-7 as the predominant isoprenoid quinone and anteiso-C15:0 was the major cellular fatty acid. The cell wall peptidoglycan contains meso-diaminopimelic acid. The polar lipid pattern of strain CAU 1183T consisted of diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylglycerol, and unidentified lipids including two phospholipids, two glycolipids, phosphoglycolipid, and two lipids. The G+C content of the genomic DNA was 37.5 mol%. On the basis of phenotypic, chemotaxonomic, and phylogenetic data, strain CAU 1183T should be classified as a novel species in the genus Oceanobacillus, for which the name Oceanobacillus arenosus sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is CAU 1183T (=KCTC 33037T, =CECT 8560T). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 29% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 29% |
| Other | 1 | 14% |
| Professor | 1 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 14% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 29% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 14% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 14% |
| Engineering | 1 | 14% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2015.
All research outputs
#22,760,732
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
#10,080
of 10,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,020
of 280,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
#106
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.