↓ Skip to main content

Understanding the benefits of providing peer feedback: how students respond to peers’ texts of varying quality

Overview of attention for article published in Instructional Science, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
108 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
Title
Understanding the benefits of providing peer feedback: how students respond to peers’ texts of varying quality
Published in
Instructional Science, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11251-015-9353-x
Authors

Melissa M. Patchan, Christian D. Schunn

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 187 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 16%
Student > Master 23 12%
Researcher 16 8%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Lecturer 14 7%
Other 29 15%
Unknown 62 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 38 20%
Psychology 21 11%
Computer Science 13 7%
Arts and Humanities 10 5%
Linguistics 9 5%
Other 29 15%
Unknown 70 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2015.
All research outputs
#13,944,553
of 22,807,037 outputs
Outputs from Instructional Science
#266
of 463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,698
of 267,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Instructional Science
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,807,037 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 463 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.