↓ Skip to main content

Baltic Sea management: Successes and failures

Overview of attention for article published in Ambio, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
Title
Baltic Sea management: Successes and failures
Published in
Ambio, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13280-015-0653-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ragnar Elmgren, Thorsten Blenckner, Agneta Andersson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 2 1%
Sweden 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 137 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 17%
Student > Bachelor 20 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 13%
Student > Master 16 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 34 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 24%
Environmental Science 34 24%
Social Sciences 10 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 40 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2015.
All research outputs
#21,075,298
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#1,809
of 1,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,489
of 281,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#22
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.