↓ Skip to main content

Toward a comprehensive language for biological systems

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biology, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
Title
Toward a comprehensive language for biological systems
Published in
BMC Biology, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1741-7007-9-68
Pubmed ID
Authors

James R Faeder

Abstract

Rule-based modeling has become a powerful approach for modeling intracellular networks, which are characterized by rich molecular diversity. Truly comprehensive models of cell behavior, however, must address spatial complexity at both the intracellular level and at the level of interacting populations of cells, and will require richer modeling languages and tools. A recent paper in BMC Systems Biology represents a signifcant step toward the development of a unified modeling language and software platform for the development of multi-level, multiscale biological models.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 8%
United Kingdom 4 3%
Brazil 3 3%
Mexico 2 2%
Portugal 2 2%
Bulgaria 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 87 75%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 43 37%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 25%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 6 5%
Professor 5 4%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 9 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 67 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 8%
Computer Science 7 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 5%
Engineering 6 5%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 11 9%