↓ Skip to main content

Environmental health risk assessment of dioxin in foods at the two most severe dioxin hot spots in Vietnam

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Hygiene & Environmental Health, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Environmental health risk assessment of dioxin in foods at the two most severe dioxin hot spots in Vietnam
Published in
International Journal of Hygiene & Environmental Health, April 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.ijheh.2015.03.014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tran Thi Tuyet-Hanh, Nguyen Hung Minh, Le Vu-Anh, Michael Dunne, Leisa-Maree Toms, Thomas Tenkate, Minh-Hue Nguyen Thi, Fiona Harden

Abstract

Bien Hoa and Da Nang airbases were bulk storages for Agent Orange during the Vietnam War and currently are the two most severe dioxin hot spots. This study assesses the health risk of exposure to dioxin through foods for local residents living in seven wards surrounding these airbases. This study follows the Australian Environmental Health Risk Assessment Framework to assess the health risk of exposure to dioxin in foods. Forty-six pooled samples of commonly consumed local foods were collected and analyzed for dioxin/furans. A food frequency and Knowledge-Attitude-Practice survey was also undertaken at 1000 local households, various stakeholders were involved and related publications were reviewed. Total dioxin/furan concentrations in samples of local "high-risk" foods (e.g. free range chicken meat and eggs, ducks, freshwater fish, snail and beef) ranged from 3.8pgTEQ/g to 95pgTEQ/g, while in "low-risk" foods (e.g. caged chicken meat and eggs, seafoods, pork, leafy vegetables, fruits, and rice) concentrations ranged from 0.03pgTEQ/g to 6.1pgTEQ/g. Estimated daily intake of dioxin if people who did not consume local high risk foods ranged from 3.2pgTEQ/kgbw/day to 6.2pgTEQ/kgbw/day (Bien Hoa) and from 1.2pgTEQ/kgbw/day to 4.3pgTEQ/kgbw/day (Da Nang). Consumption of local high risk foods resulted in extremely high dioxin daily intakes (60.4-102.8pgTEQ/kgbw/day in Bien Hoa; 27.0-148.0pgTEQ/kgbw/day in Da Nang). Consumption of local "high-risk" foods increases dioxin daily intakes far above the WHO recommended TDI (1-4pgTEQ/kgbw/day). Practicing appropriate preventive measures is necessary to significantly reduce exposure and health risk.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 69 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 21%
Student > Master 10 14%
Lecturer 8 11%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 13 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 11 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 13%
Engineering 5 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Other 17 24%
Unknown 14 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#6,784,176
of 25,460,914 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Hygiene & Environmental Health
#517
of 1,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,999
of 279,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Hygiene & Environmental Health
#9
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,460,914 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,404 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.