| Title |
Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI for quantitative assessment of liver organ damage after partial hepatic ischaemia reperfusion injury: correlation with histology and serum biomarkers of liver cell injury
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Radiology, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00330-018-5380-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tobias Getzin, Faikah Gueler, Björn Hartleben, Marcel Gutberlet, Anja Thorenz, Rongjun Chen, Martin Meier, Jan Hinrich Bräsen, Thorsten Derlin, Dagmar Hartung, Hannah A. S. Lang, Hermann Haller, Frank Wacker, Song Rong, Katja Hueper |
| Abstract |
To evaluate Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI for quantitative assessment of liver organ damage after hepatic ischaemia reperfusion injury (IRI) in mice. Partial hepatic IRI was induced in C57Bl/6 mice (n = 31) for 35, 45, 60 and 90 min. Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI was performed 1 day after surgery using a 3D-FLASH sequence. A subgroup of n = 9 animals with 60 min IRI underwent follow-up with MRI and histology 7 days after IRI. The total liver volume was determined by manual segmentation of the entire liver. The volume of functional, contrast-enhanced liver parenchyma was quantified by a region growing algorithm (visual threshold) and an automated segmentation (Otsu's method). The percentages of functional, contrast-enhanced and damaged non-enhanced parenchyma were calculated according to these volumes. MRI data was correlated with serum liver enzyme concentrations and histologically quantified organ damage using periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) staining. The percentage of functional (contrasted) liver parenchyma decreased significantly with increasing ischaemia times (control, 94.4 ± 3.3%; 35 min IRI, 89.3 ± 4.1%; 45 min IRI, 87.9 ± 3.3%; 60 min IRI, 68 ± 10.5%, p < 0.001 vs. control; 90 min IRI, 55.9 ± 11.5%, p < 0.001 vs. control). The percentage of non-contrasted liver parenchyma correlated with histologically quantified liver organ damage (r = 0.637, p < 0.01) and serum liver enzyme elevations (AST r = 0.577, p < 0.01; ALT r = 0.536, p < 0.05). Follow-up MRI visualized recovery of functional liver parenchyma (71.5 ± 8.7% vs. 84 ± 2.1%, p < 0.05), consistent with less histological organ damage on day 7. We demonstrated the feasibility of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI for non-invasive quantification of damaged liver parenchyma following IRI in mice. This novel methodology may refine the characterization of liver disease and could have application in future studies targeting liver organ damage. • Prolonged ischaemia times in partial liver IRI increase liver organ damage. • Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI at hepatobiliary phase identifies damaged liver volume after hepatic IRI. • Damaged liver parenchyma quantified with MRI correlates with histological liver damage. • Hepatobiliary phase Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI enables non-invasive assessment of recovery from liver injury. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Unknown | 7 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 41% |
| Engineering | 3 | 14% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2018.
All research outputs
#20,485,225
of 23,047,237 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#3,355
of 4,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#286,474
of 325,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#70
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,047,237 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,177 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.