↓ Skip to main content

Efficient Exploration of Membrane-Associated Phenomena at Atomic Resolution

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Membrane Biology, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Efficient Exploration of Membrane-Associated Phenomena at Atomic Resolution
Published in
The Journal of Membrane Biology, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00232-015-9806-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Josh V. Vermaas, Javier L. Baylon, Mark J. Arcario, Melanie P. Muller, Zhe Wu, Taras V. Pogorelov, Emad Tajkhorshid

Abstract

Biological membranes constitute a critical component in all living cells. In addition to providing a conducive environment to a wide range of cellular processes, including transport and signaling, mounting evidence has established active participation of specific lipids in modulating membrane protein function through various mechanisms. Understanding lipid-protein interactions underlying these mechanisms at a sufficiently high resolution has proven extremely challenging, partly due to the semi-fluid nature of the membrane. In order to address this challenge computationally, multiple methods have been developed, including an alternative membrane representation termed highly mobile membrane mimetic (HMMM) in which lateral lipid diffusion has been significantly enhanced without compromising atomic details. The model allows for efficient sampling of lipid-protein interactions at atomic resolution, thereby significantly enhancing the effectiveness of molecular dynamics simulations in capturing membrane-associated phenomena. In this review, after providing an overview of HMMM model development, we will describe briefly successful application of the model to study a variety of membrane processes, including lipid-dependent binding and insertion of peripheral proteins, the mechanism of phospholipid insertion into lipid bilayers, and characterization of optimal tilt angle of transmembrane helices. We conclude with practical recommendations for proper usage of the model in simulation studies of membrane processes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Unknown 47 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 22%
Researcher 9 18%
Professor 6 12%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 12 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 20%
Computer Science 3 6%
Philosophy 1 2%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 7 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2015.
All research outputs
#16,384,522
of 24,137,435 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Membrane Biology
#623
of 812 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,672
of 271,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Membrane Biology
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,137,435 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 812 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.