↓ Skip to main content

Research on limitations of indirect literary translation and aspects of cultural vocabulary translation

Overview of attention for article published in Neohelicon, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 153)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Research on limitations of indirect literary translation and aspects of cultural vocabulary translation
Published in
Neohelicon, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11059-015-0298-5
Authors

Kyung-Eun Park, Keun-Hye Shin, Ki-Sun Kim

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 20%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 7 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 6 30%
Linguistics 6 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Unknown 7 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,708,493
of 23,445,423 outputs
Outputs from Neohelicon
#12
of 153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,995
of 235,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neohelicon
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,445,423 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 153 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them