↓ Skip to main content

Religion, Nonreligion, and Deviance: Comparing Faith’s and Family’s Relative Strength in Promoting Social Conformity

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Religion and Health, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Religion, Nonreligion, and Deviance: Comparing Faith’s and Family’s Relative Strength in Promoting Social Conformity
Published in
Journal of Religion and Health, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10943-018-0630-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Whitney DeCamp, Jesse M. Smith

Abstract

The view that religion, as a source of moral guidance and social support, can function to prevent or protect individuals, especially children and adolescents, from a range of deviant and delinquent behaviors is largely (but not completely) born out in the literature. In nations with strong religious identities such as the USA, there is a normative expectation that adolescents who identify with religion are less likely to engage in deviant behavior than those who claim no religion. The present study explores this issue using data from over 10,000 American middle school and high school youth to examine the relationship between religion, nonreligion, and various forms of deviance. Results indicate that youth who identify with a religious (rather than nonreligious) label are not less likely to be involved in deviant acts after controlling for protective factors. The effects from some of these protective factors are significant and stronger than the effects from religion.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 14 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 7 19%
Psychology 6 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 14 39%