Title |
Canagliflozin Improves the Recovery of Blood Flow in an Experimental Model of Severe Limb Ischemia
|
---|---|
Published in |
JACC: Basic to Translational Science, May 2018
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jacbts.2018.01.010 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Stephen E. Sherman, Gillian I. Bell, Hwee Teoh, Mohammed Al-Omran, Kim A. Connelly, Deepak L. Bhatt, David A. Hess, Subodh Verma |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 6 | 30% |
United States | 4 | 20% |
India | 1 | 5% |
Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
Colombia | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 60% |
Scientists | 5 | 25% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
Professor | 2 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 17% |
Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 44% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 11% |
Chemistry | 1 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 6 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2021.
All research outputs
#3,618,115
of 25,559,053 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Basic to Translational Science
#304
of 809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,475
of 344,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Basic to Translational Science
#11
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,559,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.