↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Educational Intervention on Cervical Cancer Prevention and Screening in Hispanic Women

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Community Health, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
Effect of Educational Intervention on Cervical Cancer Prevention and Screening in Hispanic Women
Published in
Journal of Community Health, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10900-015-0045-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olivia W. Foley, Nicole Birrer, J. Alejandro Rauh-Hain, Rachel M. Clark, Elizabeth DiTavi, Marcela G. del Carmen

Abstract

To evaluate the effect of an educational intervention on four domains of health care utilization and cervical cancer prevention and screening in a Hispanic population. Data collected from a survey were used to design education strategies focused on four domains of interest. A second survey was conducted to measure the impact of the intervention. Following the intervention, respondents were more likely to have any knowledge of human papillomavirus (HPV). Respondents living in the United States (US) for <5 years were more likely to have had a Papanicolaou smear in the preceding 3 years (p = 0.0314), to report knowledge of HPV vaccination (p = 0.0258), and to be willing to vaccinate themselves (p = 0.0124) and their children (p = 0.0341) after the intervention. Educational interventions designed to meet the needs identified by the sample group led to an increase in HPV awareness throughout the entire population surveyed and an increase in health care service utilization and HPV vaccine acceptance for women living in the US for <5 years. These tools should be promoted to reduce the cervical cancer burden on vulnerable populations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 83 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 24%
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 18 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 16%
Psychology 5 6%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 23 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2015.
All research outputs
#18,345,259
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Community Health
#995
of 1,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,336
of 268,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Community Health
#13
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,660 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.