You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Doha agreement meeting on terminology and definitions in groin pain in athletes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Sports Medicine, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094869 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adam Weir, Peter Brukner, Eamonn Delahunt, Jan Ekstrand, Damian Griffin, Karim M Khan, Greg Lovell, William C Meyers, Ulrike Muschaweck, John Orchard, Hannu Paajanen, Marc Philippon, Gilles Reboul, Philip Robinson, Anthony G Schache, Ernest Schilders, Andreas Serner, Holly Silvers, Kristian Thorborg, Timothy Tyler, Geoffrey Verrall, Robert-Jan de Vos, Zarko Vuckovic, Per Hölmich |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 665 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 82 | 12% |
| United States | 43 | 6% |
| Spain | 41 | 6% |
| Australia | 27 | 4% |
| Canada | 24 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 20 | 3% |
| Ireland | 16 | 2% |
| Japan | 16 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 14 | 2% |
| Other | 123 | 18% |
| Unknown | 259 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 495 | 74% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 90 | 14% |
| Scientists | 69 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,276 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Qatar | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1261 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 272 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 218 | 17% |
| Other | 110 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 81 | 6% |
| Researcher | 56 | 4% |
| Other | 193 | 15% |
| Unknown | 346 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 331 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 271 | 21% |
| Sports and Recreations | 196 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 1% |
| Other | 69 | 5% |
| Unknown | 382 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 474. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2024.
All research outputs
#57,783
of 25,758,211 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#161
of 6,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#536
of 282,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#6
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,157 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.