↓ Skip to main content

Workplace-based assessment: a review of user perceptions and strategies to address the identified shortcomings

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Health Sciences Education, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
277 Mendeley
Title
Workplace-based assessment: a review of user perceptions and strategies to address the identified shortcomings
Published in
Advances in Health Sciences Education, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10459-015-9614-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan Massie, Jason M. Ali

Abstract

Workplace based assessments (WBAs) are now commonplace in postgraduate medical training. User acceptability and engagement is essential to the success of any medical education innovation. To this end, possessing an insight into trainee and trainer perceptions towards WBAs will help identify the major problems, permitting strategies to be introduced to improve WBA implementation. A review of literature was performed to identify studies examining trainee and trainer perceptions towards WBAs. Studies were excluded if non-English or sampling a non-medical/dental population. The identified literature was synthesised for the purpose of this critical narrative review. It is clear that there is widespread negativity towards WBAs in the workplace. This has negatively impacted on the effectiveness of WBA tools as learning aids. This negativity exists in trainees but also to an extent in their trainers. Insight gained from the literature reveals three dominant problems with WBA implementation: poor understanding as to the purpose of WBAs; insufficient time available for undertaking these assessments; and inadequate training of trainers. Approaches to addressing these three problems with WBA implementation are discussed. It is likely that a variety of solutions will be required. The prevalence of negativity towards WBAs is substantial in both trainees and trainers, eroding the effectiveness of learning that is consequent upon them. The educational community must now listen to the concerns being raised by the users and consider the range of strategies being proposed to improve the experiences of trainees, and their trainers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 277 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 273 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 12%
Student > Postgraduate 30 11%
Other 22 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 8%
Researcher 20 7%
Other 92 33%
Unknown 59 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 135 49%
Social Sciences 22 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 4%
Psychology 8 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 3%
Other 22 8%
Unknown 72 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2018.
All research outputs
#4,517,083
of 22,808,725 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Health Sciences Education
#212
of 851 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,014
of 267,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Health Sciences Education
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,808,725 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 851 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.