↓ Skip to main content

Treatment of Tendinopathy: What Works, What Does Not, and What is on the Horizon

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 7,311)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
17 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
24 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
13 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
q&a
1 Q&A thread
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
391 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1027 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Treatment of Tendinopathy: What Works, What Does Not, and What is on the Horizon
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, April 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11999-008-0260-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brett M. Andres, George A. C. Murrell

Abstract

Tendinopathy is a broad term encompassing painful conditions occurring in and around tendons in response to overuse. Recent basic science research suggests little or no inflammation is present in these conditions. Thus, traditional treatment modalities aimed at controlling inflammation such as corticosteroid injections and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory medications (NSAIDS) may not be the most effective options. We performed a systematic review of the literature to determine the best treatment options for tendinopathy. We evaluated the effectiveness of NSAIDS, corticosteroid injections, exercise-based physical therapy, physical therapy modalities, shock wave therapy, sclerotherapy, nitric oxide patches, surgery, growth factors, and stem cell treatment. NSAIDS and corticosteroids appear to provide pain relief in the short term, but their effectiveness in the long term has not been demonstrated. We identified inconsistent results with shock wave therapy and physical therapy modalities such as ultrasound, iontophoresis and low-level laser therapy. Current data support the use of eccentric strengthening protocols, sclerotherapy, and nitric oxide patches, but larger, multicenter trials are needed to confirm the early results with these treatments. Preliminary work with growth factors and stem cells is promising, but further study is required in these fields. Surgery remains the last option due to the morbidity and inconsistent outcomes. The ideal treatment for tendinopathy remains unclear.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,027 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
Canada 4 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Brazil 4 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Portugal 3 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Norway 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Other 10 <1%
Unknown 989 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 214 21%
Student > Master 163 16%
Other 96 9%
Researcher 85 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 71 7%
Other 205 20%
Unknown 193 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 410 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 138 13%
Sports and Recreations 88 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 5%
Engineering 36 4%
Other 89 9%
Unknown 216 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 170. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2023.
All research outputs
#239,725
of 25,540,105 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#26
of 7,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#395
of 89,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#1
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,540,105 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,311 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.