↓ Skip to main content

Extreme contagion in global habitat clearance

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Extreme contagion in global habitat clearance
Published in
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, November 2009
DOI 10.1098/rspb.2009.1771
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth H. Boakes, Georgina M. Mace, Philip J. K. McGowan, Richard A. Fuller

Abstract

Habitat clearance remains the major cause of biodiversity loss, with consequences for ecosystem services and for people. In response to this, many global conservation schemes direct funds to regions with high rates of recent habitat destruction, though some also emphasize the conservation of remaining large tracts of intact habitat. If the pattern of habitat clearance is highly contagious, the latter approach will help prevent destructive processes gaining a foothold in areas of contiguous intact habitat. Here, we test the strength of spatial contagion in the pattern of habitat clearance. Using a global dataset of land-cover change at 50 x 50 km resolution, we discover that intact habitat areas in grid cells are refractory to clearance only when all neighbouring cells are also intact. The likelihood of loss increases dramatically as soon as habitat is cleared in just one neighbouring cell, and remains high thereafter. This effect is consistent for forests and grassland, across biogeographic realms and over centuries, constituting a coherent global pattern. Our results show that landscapes become vulnerable to wholesale clearance as soon as threatening processes begin to penetrate, so actions to prevent any incursions into large, intact blocks of natural habitat are key to their long-term persistence.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
Australia 4 2%
Italy 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 157 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 51 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 17%
Student > Master 20 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 6%
Other 32 18%
Unknown 14 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 67 39%
Environmental Science 64 37%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 1%
Engineering 2 1%
Psychology 2 1%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 25 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2017.
All research outputs
#903,148
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#2,171
of 11,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,191
of 177,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#10
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,347 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.