↓ Skip to main content

Microeconomic Benefit of Corneal Transplantation in a Developing Country via Public–Private Partnership Model

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgery, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Microeconomic Benefit of Corneal Transplantation in a Developing Country via Public–Private Partnership Model
Published in
World Journal of Surgery, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00268-018-4643-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rahul M. Jindal, Stephen G. Waller, Shailendra Sugrim, Jan Pasternak, Joseph Pasternak

Abstract

We measured the microeconomic benefit, QOL, DALYs averted and clinical outcomes of corneal transplant surgery via a public-private partnership in Guyana. Corneas were obtained, ex gratia, from US eye banks, and the work was done at no cost to the patient or the Governments of USA or Guyana. We obtained qualitative data using a "semi-structured interview technique" to question 60 recent recipients of corneal transplants in Guyana. Our questions covered schooling in children, training for job, and type and income of job, both before and after surgery. We also discussed improvement in family income and quality of life (QOL) using a Likert scale of 1 lowest to 5 highest. Our data came from five humanitarian missions from July 2014 to July 2017. All school-going children (n = 6) were able to return to school and participate in educational activities. Young adults (n = 13), were able to acquire new jobs (50%) or training positions (50%) with higher income. Patients in the middle-age adult group (n = 20) re-acquired their employment positions (25%) or found new work (75%). Elderly patients (n = 21) after transplant were able to perform odd jobs to increase the family income. A consistent theme across all age groups was a dramatic improvement in the QOL. Two hundred and sixty DALYs (4.3 per patient) were averted. In this cohort of 62 surgery cases, mean preoperative visual acuity was 0.03 and postoperative mean visual acuity was 0.20. We have shown microeconomic benefits and improved QOL of corneal transplantation in a low-income country.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Librarian 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 2 6%
Other 10 28%
Unknown 10 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 9 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 25%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 8 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2022.
All research outputs
#2,817,747
of 23,932,398 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#382
of 4,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,291
of 329,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#8
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,932,398 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.