| Title |
Inside the “black box” of private in-house meetings
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Review of Accounting Studies, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11142-017-9433-z |
| Authors |
Robert M. Bowen, Shantanu Dutta, Songlian Tang, Pengcheng Zhu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 95 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Researcher | 4 | 4% |
| Librarian | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 35 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 27 | 28% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 23 | 24% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Engineering | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 41 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2021.
All research outputs
#2,949,642
of 23,047,237 outputs
Outputs from Review of Accounting Studies
#27
of 177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,244
of 440,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Review of Accounting Studies
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,047,237 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 177 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them