| Title |
Addressing challenges with current therapies for obstructive sleep apnea
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.69278 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cheryl R Laratta, Najib T Ayas, Marcus Povitz, Sachin R Pendharkar |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 14% |
| Other | 1 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2018.
All research outputs
#3,591,665
of 23,047,237 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#3,323
of 8,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,755
of 327,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#81
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,047,237 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,781 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.