Title |
An assessment of the risk of Bt-cowpea to non-target organisms in West Africa
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Pest Science, April 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10340-018-0974-0 |
Authors |
Malick N. Ba, Joseph E. Huesing, Manuele Tamò, Thomas J. V. Higgins, Barry R. Pittendrigh, Larry L. Murdock |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 12 | 26% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 11% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
Other | 10 | 21% |
Unknown | 11 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 49% |
Environmental Science | 4 | 9% |
Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
Psychology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Unknown | 13 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2022.
All research outputs
#746,452
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pest Science
#6
of 532 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,826
of 328,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pest Science
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 532 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.