↓ Skip to main content

Cranial nerve outcomes after primary stereotactic radiosurgery for symptomatic skull base meningiomas

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuro-Oncology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Cranial nerve outcomes after primary stereotactic radiosurgery for symptomatic skull base meningiomas
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11060-018-2866-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew Faramand, Hideyuki Kano, Ajay Niranjan, Stephen A. Johnson, Mohab Hassib, Kyung-Jae Park, Yoshio Arai, John C. Flickinger, L. Dade Lunsford

Abstract

To evaluate cranial nerve (CN) outcomes after primary stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for petroclival, cavernous sinus, and cerebellopontine angle meningiomas. From our prospectively maintained database of 2022 meningioma patients who underwent Leksell stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) during a 30-year interval, we found 98 patients with petroclival, 242 with cavernous sinus, and 55 patients with cerebellopontine angle meningiomas. Primary radiosurgery was performed in 245 patients. Patients included in this report had at least one CN deficit at the time of initial presentation and a minimum of 12 month follow up. Median age at the time of SRS was 58 years. Median follow up was 58 months (range 12-300 months), Median tumor volume treated with SRS was 5.9 cm3 (range 0.5-37.5 cm3), and median margin dose was 13 Gy (range 9-20Gy). Tumor control was achieved in 229 patients (93.5%) at a median follow up of 58 months. Progression free survival rate (PFS) after SRS was 98.7% at 1 year, 96.4% at 3 years, 93.7% at 5 years, and 86.4% at 10 years Overall, 114 of the 245 patients (46.5%) reported improvement of CN function. Patients with CP angle meningiomas demonstrated lower rates of CN improvement compared to petroclival and cavernous sinus meningioma patients. Deterioration of CN function after SRS developed in 24 patients (10%). The rate of deterioration was 2.8% at 1 year, 5.2% at 3 years, and 8% at 10 years. Primary SRS provides effective tumor control and favorable rate of improvement of preexisting CN deficit.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 16%
Researcher 6 13%
Other 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Unspecified 3 7%
Other 10 22%
Unknown 11 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 44%
Neuroscience 5 11%
Unspecified 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 13 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2019.
All research outputs
#6,922,405
of 25,378,162 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#831
of 3,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,327
of 341,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#16
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,255 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,595 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.