You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Wilderness and future conservation priorities in Australia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Diversity & Distributions, October 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2009.00601.x |
| Authors |
James E.M. Watson, Richard A. Fuller, Alexander W. T. Watson, Brendan G. Mackey, Kerrie A. Wilson, Hedley S. Grantham, Matthew Turner, Carissa J. Klein, Josie Carwardine, Liana N. Joseph, Hugh P. Possingham |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 7 | 4% |
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 154 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 42 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 30 | 17% |
| Unknown | 18 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 76 | 44% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 44 | 25% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Unknown | 28 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2014.
All research outputs
#2,384,167
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Diversity & Distributions
#438
of 1,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,927
of 106,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diversity & Distributions
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,845 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them