↓ Skip to main content

Could resuscitation be based on microcirculation data? No

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Could resuscitation be based on microcirculation data? No
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00134-018-5095-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

David N. Naumann, Alexandre Lima

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 21%
Lecturer 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 63%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Unknown 6 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2022.
All research outputs
#14,436,290
of 23,578,176 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#3,888
of 5,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,152
of 328,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#98
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,176 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,106 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.3. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.