| Title |
Predominant Improvement of Alpha Cell Function after Steroid Therapy in a Patient with Autoimmune Pancreatitis: Case Report
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Diabetes Therapy, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13300-018-0434-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ken Takeshima, Hiroyuki Ariyasu, Hiroshi Iwakura, Shintaro Kawai, Shinsuke Uraki, Hidefumi Inaba, Machi Furuta, Kenji Warigaya, Shin-ichi Murata, Takashi Akamizu |
| Abstract |
Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a subset of inflammatory pancreatic disease, responsive to corticosteroid therapy. It is prone to being affected by diabetes mellitus, but the effectiveness of steroid therapy on pancreatic endocrine function is still controversial. We present a case of AIP, focusing on pancreatic endocrine function after steroid therapy. The patient was referred to our hospital with exacerbation of diabetic control and pancreatic swelling. By admission, the insulin secretory capacity was severely impaired. The patient was diagnosed with AIP and treated with prednisolone, resulting in marked improvement of the pancreatic swelling. Glycemic control worsened transiently after initiation of steroid therapy, but insulin requirements decreased along with tapering prednisolone dosage. Pancreatic cytology showed that the acinar structure had been destroyed, and the islets had disappeared. Insulin and glucagon immunostaining revealed slightly scattered alpha and beta cells within the fibrotic stroma. The patient notably showed improved pancreatic alpha cell function predominantly after steroid therapy, despite partial improvement of beta cell function. An imbalance between alpha and beta cell function may contribute to insufficient diabetic control in some patients with AIP. The pancreatic endocrine function test in combination with pancreatic cytology could be helpful when considering the treatment strategy for diabetic control in patients with AIP. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2018.
All research outputs
#14,390,935
of 23,047,237 outputs
Outputs from Diabetes Therapy
#481
of 1,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,402
of 326,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetes Therapy
#19
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,047,237 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,040 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.