↓ Skip to main content

Integrating adaptive management and ecosystem services concepts to improve natural resource management: Challenges and opportunities

Overview of attention for article published in US Geological Survey, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Integrating adaptive management and ecosystem services concepts to improve natural resource management: Challenges and opportunities
Published in
US Geological Survey, January 2018
DOI 10.3133/cir1439
Authors

Epanchin-Niell, Rebecca S., Boyd, James W., Macauley, Molly K., Scarlett, Lynn, Shapiro, Carl D., Williams, Byron K.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 44%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 33%
Student > Master 1 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 3 33%
Unspecified 1 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 11%
Other 2 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2018.
All research outputs
#1,040,644
of 23,047,237 outputs
Outputs from US Geological Survey
#62
of 2,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,405
of 442,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from US Geological Survey
#6
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,047,237 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,157 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.