↓ Skip to main content

Improving the Crossing Lemma by Finding More Crossings in Sparse Graphs

Overview of attention for article published in Discrete & Computational Geometry, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Improving the Crossing Lemma by Finding More Crossings in Sparse Graphs
Published in
Discrete & Computational Geometry, October 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00454-006-1264-9
Authors

Janos Pach, Rados Radoicic, Gabor Tardos, Geza Toth

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 50%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 25%
Lecturer 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 2 50%
Computer Science 1 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2018.
All research outputs
#7,555,516
of 23,047,237 outputs
Outputs from Discrete & Computational Geometry
#111
of 484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,397
of 66,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Discrete & Computational Geometry
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,047,237 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 484 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,796 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them