↓ Skip to main content

Are we training pit bulls to review our manuscripts?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biology, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
7 blogs
twitter
164 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3292 Mendeley
citeulike
24 CiteULike
connotea
4 Connotea
Title
Are we training pit bulls to review our manuscripts?
Published in
BMC Biology, March 2009
DOI 10.1186/jbiol125
Pubmed ID
Authors

Virginia Walbot

Abstract

Good early training of graduate students and postdocs is needed to prevent them turning into future generations of manuscript-savaging reviewers. How can we intercalate typical papers into our training?

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 164 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3,292 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 126 4%
United Kingdom 47 1%
Brazil 31 <1%
Germany 30 <1%
Canada 18 <1%
Japan 16 <1%
France 16 <1%
Spain 15 <1%
Switzerland 12 <1%
Other 91 3%
Unknown 2890 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 814 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 538 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 433 13%
Professor 387 12%
Other 213 6%
Other 591 18%
Unknown 316 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 763 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 555 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 194 6%
Physics and Astronomy 174 5%
Engineering 141 4%
Other 1089 33%
Unknown 376 11%