↓ Skip to main content

A case of spontaneous acquisition of a human sound by an orangutan

Overview of attention for article published in Primates, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
Title
A case of spontaneous acquisition of a human sound by an orangutan
Published in
Primates, December 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10329-008-0117-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Serge A. Wich, Karyl B. Swartz, Madeleine E. Hardus, Adriano R. Lameira, Erin Stromberg, Robert W. Shumaker

Abstract

The capacity of nonhuman primates to actively modify the acoustic structure of existing sounds or vocalizations in their repertoire appears limited. Several studies have reported population or community differences in the acoustical structure of nonhuman primate long distance calls and have suggested vocal learning as a mechanism for explaining such variation. In addition, recent studies on great apes have indicated that there are repertoire differences between populations. Some populations have sounds in their repertoire that others have not. These differences have also been suggested to be the result of vocal learning. On yet another level great apes can, after extensive human training, also learn some species atypical vocalizations. Here we show a new aspect of great ape vocal learning by providing data that an orangutan has spontaneously (without any training) acquired a human whistle and can modulate the duration and number of whistles to copy a human model. This might indicate that the learning capacities of great apes in the auditory domain might be more flexible than hitherto assumed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 3%
United States 3 2%
Japan 2 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 120 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 20%
Researcher 24 18%
Student > Master 22 17%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 17 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 46%
Psychology 18 14%
Environmental Science 7 5%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 22 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#563,360
of 23,556,846 outputs
Outputs from Primates
#54
of 1,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,712
of 168,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Primates
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,556,846 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,034 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them