↓ Skip to main content

Computationalism, The Church–Turing Thesis, and the Church–Turing Fallacy

Overview of attention for article published in Synthese, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Computationalism, The Church–Turing Thesis, and the Church–Turing Fallacy
Published in
Synthese, January 2007
DOI 10.1007/s11229-005-0194-z
Authors

Gualtiero Piccinini

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Spain 2 3%
Canada 2 3%
France 1 2%
Norway 1 2%
New Zealand 1 2%
Unknown 54 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Bachelor 11 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 14%
Other 6 10%
Professor 5 8%
Other 15 24%
Unknown 6 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 16 25%
Computer Science 14 22%
Arts and Humanities 5 8%
Physics and Astronomy 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Other 16 25%
Unknown 5 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2021.
All research outputs
#7,447,868
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from Synthese
#821
of 2,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,143
of 156,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Synthese
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,459 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.