| Title |
The study protocol for a randomized controlled trial of a family-centred tobacco control program about environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) to reduce respiratory illness in Indigenous infants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, March 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-10-114 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vanessa Johnston, Natalie Walker, David P Thomas, Marewa Glover, Anne B Chang, Chris Bullen, Peter Morris, Ngiare Brown, Stephen Vander Hoorn, Ron Borland, Catherine Segan, Adrian Trenholme, Toni Mason, Debra Fenton, Kane Ellis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 75 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 18% |
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 17% |
| Unknown | 15 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 29% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 13% |
| Psychology | 6 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 18% |
| Unknown | 18 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2015.
All research outputs
#7,772,000
of 24,920,664 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#8,275
of 16,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,813
of 98,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#26
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,920,664 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,585 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.