↓ Skip to main content

The conclusions on the effectiveness of homeopathy highly depend on the set of analyzed trials

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
37 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
video
4 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The conclusions on the effectiveness of homeopathy highly depend on the set of analyzed trials
Published in
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, October 2008
DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.06.015
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. Lüdtke, A.L.B. Rutten

Abstract

Shang's recently published meta-analysis on homeopathic remedies (Lancet) based its main conclusion on a subset of eight larger trials out of 21 high quality trials (out of 110 included trials). We performed a sensitivity analysis on various other meaningful trial subsets of all high quality trials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
Switzerland 2 2%
Germany 2 2%
Greece 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 94 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 17%
Student > Master 17 17%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Other 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Other 26 25%
Unknown 13 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 42%
Social Sciences 10 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 3%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 16 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2022.
All research outputs
#674,510
of 25,760,414 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
#158
of 4,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,367
of 102,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
#1
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,760,414 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.