↓ Skip to main content

Assessing the impact of essential tremor on upper limb function

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, January 1993
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Assessing the impact of essential tremor on upper limb function
Published in
Journal of Neurology, January 1993
DOI 10.1007/bf00870673
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter G. Bain, Judit Mally, Michael Gresty, Leslie J. Findley

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 52 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Student > Master 3 6%
Other 11 21%
Unknown 12 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 30%
Neuroscience 7 13%
Engineering 6 11%
Computer Science 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 13 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2017.
All research outputs
#7,460,230
of 22,808,725 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#1,774
of 4,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,051
of 65,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,808,725 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,475 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.