↓ Skip to main content

Assessing introgressive hybridization between blue wildebeest (Connochaetes taurinus) and black wildebeest (Connochaetes gnou) from South Africa

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Genetics, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Assessing introgressive hybridization between blue wildebeest (Connochaetes taurinus) and black wildebeest (Connochaetes gnou) from South Africa
Published in
Conservation Genetics, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10592-018-1071-x
Authors

Paul Grobler, Anna M. van Wyk, Desiré L. Dalton, Bettine Jansen van Vuuren, Antoinette Kotzé

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 24%
Student > Bachelor 5 15%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 9 27%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 18%
Environmental Science 4 12%
Unspecified 1 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 5 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2018.
All research outputs
#18,606,163
of 23,047,237 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#957
of 1,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,320
of 326,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#12
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,047,237 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.