| Title |
A Burgessian Critique of Nominalistic Tendencies in Contemporary Mathematics and its Historiography
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Foundations of Science, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10699-011-9223-1 |
| Authors |
Karin Usadi Katz, Mikhail G. Katz |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 24% |
| Unknown | 4 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematics | 3 | 18% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 12% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 6% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 24% |
| Unknown | 4 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,460,230
of 22,808,725 outputs
Outputs from Foundations of Science
#89
of 273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,131
of 108,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Foundations of Science
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,808,725 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.