↓ Skip to main content

Lu–Hf total-rock isochron for the eucrite meteorites

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, December 1980
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
157 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lu–Hf total-rock isochron for the eucrite meteorites
Published in
Nature, December 1980
DOI 10.1038/288571a0
Authors

P. J. Patchett, M. Tatsumoto

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 36 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 27%
Student > Master 6 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Professor 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 6 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 25 68%
Chemistry 3 8%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Unknown 8 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2023.
All research outputs
#7,428,992
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#65,243
of 90,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,918
of 28,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#44
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 90,725 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.2. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.