↓ Skip to main content

IS FLORAL SPECIALIZATION AN EVOLUTIONARY DEAD‐END? POLLINATION SYSTEM TRANSITIONS IN RUELLIA (ACANTHACEAE)

Overview of attention for article published in Evolution, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
187 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
350 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
IS FLORAL SPECIALIZATION AN EVOLUTIONARY DEAD‐END? POLLINATION SYSTEM TRANSITIONS IN RUELLIA (ACANTHACEAE)
Published in
Evolution, July 2008
DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00398.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erin A Tripp, Paul S Manos

Abstract

Pollination systems frequently reflect adaptations to particular groups of pollinators. Such systems are indicative of evolutionary specialization and have been important in angiosperm diversification. We studied the evolution of pollination systems in the large genus Ruellia. Phylogenetic analyses, morphological ordinations, ancestral state reconstructions, and a character mapping simulation were conducted to reveal key patterns in the direction and lability of floral characters associated with pollination. We found significant floral morphological differences among species that were generally associated with different groups of floral visitors. Floral evolution has been highly labile and also directional. Some specialized systems such as hawkmoth or bat pollination are likely evolutionary dead-ends. In contrast, specialized pollination by hummingbirds is clearly not a dead-end. We found evidence for multiple reverse transitions from presumed ancestral hummingbird pollination to more derived bee or insect pollination. These repeated origins of insect pollination from hummingbird-pollinated ancestors have not evolved without historical baggage. Flowers of insect-pollinated species derived from hummingbird-pollinated ancestors are morphologically more similar to hummingbird flowers than they are to other more distantly related insect-pollinated flowers. Finally, some pollinator switches were concomitant with changes in floral morphology that are associated with those pollinators. These observations are consistent with the hypothesis that some transitions have been adaptive in the evolution of Ruellia.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 350 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 3%
United Kingdom 6 2%
Brazil 4 1%
Spain 4 1%
Japan 2 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Papua New Guinea 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 5 1%
Unknown 312 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 20%
Researcher 69 20%
Student > Master 50 14%
Student > Bachelor 38 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 21 6%
Other 64 18%
Unknown 39 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 240 69%
Environmental Science 28 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 2%
Computer Science 4 1%
Other 10 3%
Unknown 48 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2008.
All research outputs
#5,467,604
of 22,914,829 outputs
Outputs from Evolution
#1,803
of 5,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,405
of 81,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evolution
#11
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,914,829 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,502 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.