| Title |
Color matching on natural substrates in cuttlefish, Sepia officinalis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Comparative Physiology A, April 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00359-008-0332-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lydia M. Mäthger, Chuan-Chin Chiao, Alexandra Barbosa, Roger T. Hanlon |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 4% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 119 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 20% |
| Researcher | 21 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Unknown | 20 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 76 | 58% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 5% |
| Psychology | 5 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Unknown | 20 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2022.
All research outputs
#2,087,154
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#121
of 1,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,368
of 83,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them