↓ Skip to main content

Oral microbiomes: more and more importance in oral cavity and whole body

Overview of attention for article published in Protein & Cell, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#39 of 827)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
18 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
469 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
836 Mendeley
Title
Oral microbiomes: more and more importance in oral cavity and whole body
Published in
Protein & Cell, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s13238-018-0548-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lu Gao, Tiansong Xu, Gang Huang, Song Jiang, Yan Gu, Feng Chen

Abstract

Microbes appear in every corner of human life, and microbes affect every aspect of human life. The human oral cavity contains a number of different habitats. Synergy and interaction of variable oral microorganisms help human body against invasion of undesirable stimulation outside. However, imbalance of microbial flora contributes to oral diseases and systemic diseases. Oral microbiomes play an important role in the human microbial community and human health. The use of recently developed molecular methods has greatly expanded our knowledge of the composition and function of the oral microbiome in health and disease. Studies in oral microbiomes and their interactions with microbiomes in variable body sites and variable health condition are critical in our cognition of our body and how to make effect on human health improvement.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 836 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 836 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 98 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 92 11%
Student > Master 92 11%
Researcher 64 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 33 4%
Other 116 14%
Unknown 341 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 166 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 84 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 59 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 52 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 19 2%
Other 83 10%
Unknown 373 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,004,160
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Protein & Cell
#39
of 827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,743
of 344,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Protein & Cell
#3
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.