↓ Skip to main content

Structural divergence between the human and chimpanzee genomes

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Structural divergence between the human and chimpanzee genomes
Published in
Human Genetics, October 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00439-006-0270-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hildegard Kehrer-Sawatzki, David N. Cooper

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
United States 2 2%
Spain 2 2%
Brazil 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
China 1 1%
Unknown 75 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 24%
Professor 8 9%
Student > Master 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 9 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 60%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 6%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 9 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2023.
All research outputs
#7,460,230
of 22,808,725 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#932
of 2,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,815
of 68,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#11
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,808,725 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,953 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.