↓ Skip to main content

Cocoa Intensification Scenarios and Their Predicted Impact on CO2 Emissions, Biodiversity Conservation, and Rural Livelihoods in the Guinea Rain Forest of West Africa

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Management, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#41 of 2,036)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
193 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
491 Mendeley
Title
Cocoa Intensification Scenarios and Their Predicted Impact on CO2 Emissions, Biodiversity Conservation, and Rural Livelihoods in the Guinea Rain Forest of West Africa
Published in
Environmental Management, December 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00267-010-9602-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jim Gockowski, Denis Sonwa

Abstract

The Guinean rain forest (GRF) of West Africa, identified over 20 years ago as a global biodiversity hotspot, had reduced to 113,000 km² at the start of the new millennium which was 18% of its original area. The principal driver of this environmental change has been the expansion of extensive smallholder agriculture. From 1988 to 2007, the area harvested in the GRF by smallholders of cocoa, cassava, and oil palm increased by 68,000 km². Field results suggest a high potential for significantly increasing crop yields through increased application of seed-fertilizer technologies. Analyzing land-use change scenarios, it was estimated that had intensified cocoa technology, already developed in the 1960s, been pursued in Cote d'Ivoire, Ghana, Nigeria and Cameroon that over 21,000 km² of deforestation and forest degradation could have been avoided along with the emission of nearly 1.4 billion t of CO₂. Addressing the low productivity of agriculture in the GRF should be one of the principal objectives of REDD climate mitigation programs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 491 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Indonesia 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Bolivia, Plurinational State of 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 467 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 85 17%
Student > Master 83 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 79 16%
Student > Bachelor 45 9%
Other 24 5%
Other 79 16%
Unknown 96 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 141 29%
Environmental Science 125 25%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 24 5%
Social Sciences 22 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 20 4%
Other 42 9%
Unknown 117 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2024.
All research outputs
#855,374
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Management
#41
of 2,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,706
of 197,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Management
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.