↓ Skip to main content

Naturalism, Science and the Supernatural

Overview of attention for article published in Sophia, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#39 of 267)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Naturalism, Science and the Supernatural
Published in
Sophia, April 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11841-009-0099-2
Authors

Steve Clarke

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 6%
New Zealand 1 6%
United States 1 6%
Canada 1 6%
Unknown 12 75%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 19%
Researcher 3 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 19%
Student > Master 2 13%
Other 2 13%
Other 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 6 38%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 19%
Psychology 2 13%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Other 3 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2021.
All research outputs
#7,460,230
of 22,808,725 outputs
Outputs from Sophia
#39
of 267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,621
of 93,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sophia
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,808,725 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 267 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.