↓ Skip to main content

Drug Carriers: Not an Innocent Delivery Man

Overview of attention for article published in The AAPS Journal, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Drug Carriers: Not an Innocent Delivery Man
Published in
The AAPS Journal, May 2015
DOI 10.1208/s12248-015-9789-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yoon Yeo, Bieong-Kil Kim

Abstract

Biomaterials used as drug carriers are often considered inactive and assumed to have no other roles than modifying pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of a drug. On the other hand, there are several examples in which the carrier materials show bioactivities in the body, which may have been underestimated or inadvertently ignored. This review highlights several examples where biomaterials used as drug carriers bring biological effects, known or newly discovered, and discusses their implications in development of new drug delivery systems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 6 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 4 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 7 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2015.
All research outputs
#18,412,793
of 22,808,725 outputs
Outputs from The AAPS Journal
#1,101
of 1,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,580
of 266,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The AAPS Journal
#21
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,808,725 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,287 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.