| Title |
The Fake, the Flimsy, and the Fallacious: Demarcating Arguments in Real Life
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Argumentation, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10503-015-9359-1 |
| Authors |
Maarten Boudry, Fabio Paglieri, Massimo Pigliucci |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 18% |
| Comoros | 1 | 6% |
| Italy | 1 | 6% |
| Brazil | 1 | 6% |
| Colombia | 1 | 6% |
| Belgium | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 71% |
| Scientists | 4 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 59 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 13% |
| Researcher | 8 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 15 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Philosophy | 8 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 8% |
| Psychology | 5 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 30% |
| Unknown | 14 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,323,820
of 25,628,260 outputs
Outputs from Argumentation
#5
of 310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,136
of 281,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Argumentation
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,628,260 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 310 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,615 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them