↓ Skip to main content

Heavy metal tolerance by ectomycorrhizal fungi and metal amelioration by Pisolithus tinctorius

Overview of attention for article published in Mycorrhiza, February 1995
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Heavy metal tolerance by ectomycorrhizal fungi and metal amelioration by Pisolithus tinctorius
Published in
Mycorrhiza, February 1995
DOI 10.1007/bf00203335
Authors

Paul C. F. Tam

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Czechia 1 2%
Morocco 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 59 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 27%
Student > Master 15 24%
Researcher 6 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 9 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 50%
Environmental Science 10 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Unspecified 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 14 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2017.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Mycorrhiza
#203
of 712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,963
of 78,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mycorrhiza
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 712 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them