↓ Skip to main content

Long-term stability of synthetic cathinones in dried blood spots and whole blood samples: a comparative study

Overview of attention for article published in Forensic Toxicology, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Long-term stability of synthetic cathinones in dried blood spots and whole blood samples: a comparative study
Published in
Forensic Toxicology, May 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11419-018-0418-9
Authors

Kelly Francisco da Cunha, Marcos Nogueira Eberlin, Jose Luiz Costa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 16%
Student > Master 3 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 16%
Other 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 42%
Chemistry 4 21%
Unknown 7 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2018.
All research outputs
#15,508,366
of 23,047,237 outputs
Outputs from Forensic Toxicology
#217
of 386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,571
of 327,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forensic Toxicology
#12
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,047,237 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.