| Title |
Divine foreknowledge and Newcomb's paradox
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Philosophia, October 1987
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02455055 |
| Authors |
William Lane Craig |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 60% |
| Researcher | 1 | 20% |
| Other | 1 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 2 | 40% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 20% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 20% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,652,891
of 23,299,593 outputs
Outputs from Philosophia
#130
of 601 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,547
of 12,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophia
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,299,593 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 601 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 12,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them