| Title |
Disproportionate frequency representation in the inferior colliculus of doppler-compensating Greater Horseshoe bats: Evidence for an acoustic fovea
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Comparative Physiology A, March 1979
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00617731 |
| Authors |
Gerd Schuller, George Pollak |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 63 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 20% |
| Unknown | 8 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 43 | 62% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 6% |
| Engineering | 4 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2022.
All research outputs
#4,312,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#256
of 1,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#495
of 5,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,550 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 5,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.