↓ Skip to main content

Sex-specific glioma genome-wide association study identifies new risk locus at 3p21.31 in females, and finds sex-differences in risk at 8q24.21

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
20 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sex-specific glioma genome-wide association study identifies new risk locus at 3p21.31 in females, and finds sex-differences in risk at 8q24.21
Published in
Scientific Reports, May 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-24580-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Quinn T. Ostrom, Ben Kinnersley, Margaret R. Wrensch, Jeanette E. Eckel-Passow, Georgina Armstrong, Terri Rice, Yanwen Chen, John K. Wiencke, Lucie S. McCoy, Helen M. Hansen, Christopher I. Amos, Jonine L. Bernstein, Elizabeth B. Claus, Dora Il’yasova, Christoffer Johansen, Daniel H. Lachance, Rose K. Lai, Ryan T. Merrell, Sara H. Olson, Siegal Sadetzki, Joellen M. Schildkraut, Sanjay Shete, Joshua B. Rubin, Justin D. Lathia, Michael E. Berens, Ulrika Andersson, Preetha Rajaraman, Stephen J. Chanock, Martha S. Linet, Zhaoming Wang, Meredith Yeager, GliomaScan consortium, Richard S. Houlston, Robert B. Jenkins, Beatrice Melin, Melissa L. Bondy, Jill. S. Barnholtz-Sloan

Abstract

Incidence of glioma is approximately 50% higher in males. Previous analyses have examined exposures related to sex hormones in women as potential protective factors for these tumors, with inconsistent results. Previous glioma genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have not stratified by sex. Potential sex-specific genetic effects were assessed in autosomal SNPs and sex chromosome variants for all glioma, GBM and non-GBM patients using data from four previous glioma GWAS. Datasets were analyzed using sex-stratified logistic regression models and combined using meta-analysis. There were 4,831 male cases, 5,216 male controls, 3,206 female cases and 5,470 female controls. A significant association was detected at rs11979158 (7p11.2) in males only. Association at rs55705857 (8q24.21) was stronger in females than in males. A large region on 3p21.31 was identified with significant association in females only. The identified differences in effect of risk variants do not fully explain the observed incidence difference in glioma by sex.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 92 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 16%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 30 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 18%
Neuroscience 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 36 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 81. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2019.
All research outputs
#463,975
of 23,367,368 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#5,200
of 126,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,487
of 328,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#148
of 3,344 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,367,368 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 126,344 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,344 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.