| Title |
Hardy-type inequalities in fractional h-discrete calculus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Inequalities and Applications, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13660-018-1662-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lars-Erik Persson, Ryskul Oinarov, Serikbol Shaimardan |
| Abstract |
The first power weighted version of Hardy's inequality can be rewritten as [Formula: see text] where the constant [Formula: see text] is sharp. This inequality holds in the reversed direction when [Formula: see text]. In this paper we prove and discuss some discrete analogues of Hardy-type inequalities in fractional h-discrete calculus. Moreover, we prove that the corresponding constants are sharp. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 1 | 50% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematics | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2018.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Inequalities and Applications
#59
of 175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,178
of 342,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Inequalities and Applications
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 175 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.