| Title |
Basic study on pulse generator for micro-EDM
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, March 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00170-006-0483-9 |
| Authors |
Fuzhu Han, Li Chen, Dingwen Yu, Xiaoguang Zhou |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 92 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 32% |
| Researcher | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 9 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 71 | 76% |
| Materials Science | 4 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 12 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2020.
All research outputs
#7,846,128
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
#264
of 1,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,121
of 67,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
#4
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,230 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,906 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.